4.7 Article

A Low-Toxicity IL-2-Based Immunocytokine Retains Antitumor Activity Despite Its High Degree of IL-2 Receptor Selectivity

Journal

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 17, Issue 11, Pages 3673-3685

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2921

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: The goal of the study was to engineer a form of interleukin 2 (IL-2) that, when delivered as a tumor-specific antibody fusion protein, retains the ability to stimulate an antitumor immune response via interaction with the high-affinity IL-2 receptor but has lower toxicity because of the reduced activation of the intermediate-affinity IL-2 receptor. Experimental Design: We investigated changes in the proposed toxin motif of IL-2 by introducing a D20T mutation that has little effect on the activity of free IL-2. We expressed this IL-2 variant as a fusion protein with an antibody (NHS76) that targets the necrotic core of tumors and characterized this molecule (NHS-IL2LT) in vitro and in vivo. Results: NHS-IL2LT was shown to have near normal biological activity in vitro by using T-cell lines expressing the high-affinity IL-2 receptor, but little or no activity by using cell lines expressing only the intermediate IL-2 receptor. Relative to the control antibody fusion protein containing wild-type IL-2, NHS-IL2LT retained antitumor activity against established neuroblastoma and non-small cell lung cancer metastases in syngeneic mouse tumor models but was much better tolerated in immune-competent mice and in cynomolgus monkeys. Conclusions: The qualities of low toxicity and single-agent efficacy shown suggest that NHS-IL2LT is a good candidate for therapeutic approaches combining standard cytotoxic and immune therapies. In fact, this molecule (also known as Selectikine or EMD 521873) is currently in phase I clinical trial. Clin Cancer Res; 17(11); 3673-85. (C)2011 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available