4.7 Article

Immunobiomarkers in Small Cell Lung Cancer: Potential Early Cancer Signals

Journal

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages 1474-1480

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1363

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Oncimmune Ltd.
  2. University of Nottingham
  3. Association of British Neurologists

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: We investigated the presence of autoantibodies as immunobiomarkers to a panel of tumor-associated antigens in a group of individuals with small cell lung cancer (SCLC), a disease group that has a poor overall cancer prognosis and therefore may benefit most from early diagnosis. Experimental Design: Sera from 243 patients with confirmed SCLC and normal controls matched for age, sex, and smoking history were analyzed for the presence of these early immunobiomarkers (i.e., autoantibodies to p53, CAGE, NY-ESO-1, GBU4-5, Annexin I, SOX2, and Hu-D) by ELISA. Results: Autoantibodies were seen to at least 1 of 6 antigens in 55% of all the SCLC patients' sera tested, with a specificity of 90% compared with controls. Using a higher assay cutoff to achieve a specificity of 99%, autoantibodies were still detectable in 42% of SCLC patients (receiver operator characteristic area under the curve = 0.76). There was no significant difference in sensitivity when analyzed by stage of the cancer or by patient age or gender. The frequency of autoantibodies to individual antigens varied, ranging from 4% for GBU4-5 to 35% for SOX2. Levels of Annexin I autoantibodies were not elevated in patients with SCLC. Antibodies were also detected in 4 separate patients whose sera were taken up to 3 months before tumor diagnosis. Conclusion: The presence of an autoantibody to one or more cancer-associated antigens may provide an important addition to the armamentarium available to the clinician to aid early detection of SCLC in high-risk individuals. Clin Cancer Res; 17(6); 1474-80. (C) 2011 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available