4.7 Article

Intercohort Gene Expression Co-Analysis Reveals Chemokine Receptors as Prognostic Indicators in Ewing's Sarcoma

Journal

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 16, Issue 14, Pages 3769-3778

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-0558

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH [1U01CA114757-04]
  2. European Community [037260]
  3. National Austrian Bank [OeNB-12765]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: We report a novel analytic method, named intercohort co-analysis or Ican, which aids in the discovery of genes with predictive value for the progression or outcome of diseases from small-size cohorts. We tested this premise in Ewing's sarcoma (ES), a highly metastatic cancer of bone and soft tissues that lacks validated molecular metastasis and prognostic indicators. Experimental Design: To uncover genes significantly expressed in ES patient subsets, we first determined a nonarbitrary gene expression significance cutoff based on expression levels in validated expressing and nonexpressing tissues. We next searched for genes that were consistently significantly expressed in several ES cohort and cell line datasets. Significantly expressed genes were independently validated by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR in an additional ES cohort. Results: Analysis of ES cohorts revealed marked intercohort gene expression variability. After filtering out the intercohort variability, CXCR4 and CXCR7 were found to be consistently associated with specific ES subsets. Pairwise analyses showed CXCR4 to correlate with ES metastases, and CXCR4 and CXCR7 to patient survival, but not with several other clinicopathological variables. Conclusion: Ican is a powerful novel method to identifying genes consistently associated with particular disease states in cancers for which large cohorts are not available, currently the case of most cancers. We report for the first time that high CXCR4 expression preferentially associates with metastatic ES, and that of CXCR7 with poor patient survival. Clin Cancer Res; 16(14); 3769-78. ((C))2010 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available