4.7 Article

Ten Common Genetic Variants Associated with Colorectal Cancer Risk Are Not Associated with Survival after Diagnosis

Journal

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 16, Issue 14, Pages 3754-3759

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-0439

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Cancer Research UK [C348/A3758, C348/A8896]
  2. CORE Charity as part of the Digestive Cancer Campaign, Scottish Government Chief Scientist Office [K/OPR/2/2/D333, CZB/4/94]
  3. Medical Research Council [G0000657-53203]
  4. Cancer Research UK Fellowship [C31250/A10107]
  5. Cancer Research UK Clinician Scientist Fellowship [C26031/A11378]
  6. MRC [MC_U127527198] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Cancer Research UK [11378] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Chief Scientist Office [CZB/4/449] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. Medical Research Council [MC_U127527198] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To date, genomewide association studies have identified 10 genetic loci associated with colorectal cancer (CRC) susceptibility. We hypothesized that these loci might also affect cancer survival. Experimental Design: To determine whether single-nucleotide polymorphisms tagging these 10 loci influenced all-cause and CRC-specific mortality, we prospectively followed survival outcomes for 2,838 Scottish patients recruited soon after a diagnosis of CRC. Survival analysis was conducted using Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for American Joint Committee on Cancer stage, age, and sex. Results: None of the single-nucleotide polymorphisms were found to be statistically significantly associated with all-cause or CRC-specific mortality. Conclusions: We conclude that none of the 10 common genetic variants thus far shown to be associated with CRC risk are associated with survival from CRC. Clin Cancer Res; 16(14); 3754-9. (C)2010 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available