4.7 Article

Genotypic Profiling of 452 Choroidal Melanomas with Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification

Journal

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 16, Issue 24, Pages 6083-6092

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2076

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Royal Liverpool University Hospital

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Metastasis from uveal melanoma occurs almost exclusively with tumors showing chromosome 3 loss. We used multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) to detect chromosome 1p, 3, 6p, 6q, 8p, and 8q abnormalities in uveal melanomas. The purpose of this study was to correlate our MLPA results with other risk factors and metastatic death. Experimental Design: Patients were included if they had a uveal melanoma involving choroid. Correlations between baseline risk factors were analyzed using the chi-square test (without Yates's adjustment) and the Mann-Whitney test, with log-rank analysis for associations with metastatic death. Results: The patients (194 female; 258 male) had a median age of 59.4 years and a median follow-up of 1.89 years. MLPA abnormalities occurred in a wide variety of combinations. Ten-year disease-specific mortality was 0% in 133 tumors with no chromosome 3 loss, 55% in tumors with chromosome 3 loss but no chromosome 8q gain, and 71% in 168 tumors showing combined chromosome 3 loss and 8q gain. In tumors with both these abnormalities, epithelioid melanoma cytomorphology, closed loops, and high mitotic rate correlated with poor survival as did lack of chromosome 6p gain. Conclusions: These results support the use of MLPA for routine clinical prognostication, especially if the genetic data are considered together with clinical and histologic risk factors. We showed a wide variety of MLPA results, which suggests that chromosomal abnormalities in uveal melanoma accumulate in a variable sequence. Clin Cancer Res; 16(24); 6083-92. (C) 2010 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available