4.7 Article

ERBB2 and TOP2A in Breast Cancer: A Comprehensive Analysis of Gene Amplification, RNA Levels, and Protein Expression and Their Influence on Prognosis and Prediction

Journal

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 16, Issue 8, Pages 2391-2401

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2471

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Federal Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: The prognostic and predictive relevance of epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (ERBB2) and topoisomerase II alpha (TOP2A) have long been a matter of debate. However, the correlation of DNA amplification, RNA levels, and protein expression and their prognostic role and association with anthracycline responses in node-negative breast cancer have not yet been evaluated. Experimental Design: We first analyzed TOP2A and ERBB2 at the levels of gene amplification, and RNA and protein expression, and studied their correlations. Additionally, TOP2A and ERBB2 were analyzed in 782 node-negative breast carcinomas in patients who did not receive systemic therapy and in 80 patients treated with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (EC) prior to surgery. Results: TOP2A gene amplification did not correlate with protein expression (P = 0.283) and showed an association with gene expression with only borderline significance (P = 0.047). By contrast, TOP2A RNA levels correlated with protein expression (P < 0.001). TOP2A gene expression was significantly associated with the metastasis-free interval (MFI; P < 0.001) and was associated with complete remission in patients treated with EC (P = 0.002). In contrast to TOP2A, ERBB2 gene amplification correlated with RNA level (P < 0.001) and protein expression (P < 0.001). ERBB2 gene expression was associated with the MFI only in estrogen receptor-positive carcinomas, whereas ERBB2 protein expression (P = 0.032) was associated with MFI in the entire cohort. Conclusions: Overall, our study indicates that the TOP2A RNA level is a good prognostic marker and is also associated with a favorable response to anthracyclin-based therapy. By contrast, ESR1 was associated with poorer responses to anthracyclin-based therapy, whereas the association with ERBB2 RNA was not significant. Clin Cancer Res; 16(8); 2391-401. (C) 2010 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available