4.7 Article

Hypoxia Inducible Factor 1α and Hypoxia Inducible Factor 2α Play Distinct and Functionally Overlapping Roles in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Journal

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 16, Issue 19, Pages 4732-4741

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1408

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30872889, 81072215, 81001210]
  2. Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, State Education Ministry [20098-8-2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the functional difference between hypoxia inducible factor (HIF)-1 alpha and HIF-2 alpha in oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCC). Experimental Design: We evaluated the correlations between HIF-1 alpha and HIF-2 alpha expression and the clinical-pathologic characteristics of 97 patients with OSCC by immunohistochemical staining. OSCC cell lines transfected with lentivirus encoding short hairpin RNA against HIF-1 alpha/2 alpha were used to investigate the HIF-1 alpha/2 alpha-dependent target genes. Xenograft tumors in nude mice were established using cells affected by lentivirus, and tumor growth, angiogenesis, proliferation, and apoptosis were measured. Results: HIF-1 alpha expression was significantly associated with T stage (P = 0.004), lymph node involvement (P = 0.006), histologic differentiation (P = 0.013), and microvessel density (P = 0.014), whereas that of HIF-2 alpha was associated with T stage (P = 0.011) and microvessel density (P = 0.005). Patients with positive HIF-1 alpha nuclear staining had a significantly worse overall survival (P < 0.001) and disease-free survival (P < 0.001) than those with negative HIF-1 alpha staining. When OSCC cells were cultured at 5% O-2, only HIF-2 alpha contributed to the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor. At 1% O-2, vascular endothelial growth factor was regulated by both HIF-1 alpha and HIF-2 alpha, but glucose transporter 1, carbonic anhydrase 9, and urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor were regulated by HIF-1 alpha rather than by HIF-2 alpha. Knocking down HIF-1 alpha or HIF-2 alpha individually inhibited the xenograft tumor angiogenesis and growth, and knocking them down simultaneously revealed a better inhibitory effect than knocking down either unit alone. Conclusions: HIF-1 alpha and HIF-2 alpha correlated with different clinical-pathologic parameters, stabilized at different oxygen levels, and regulated different genes in OSCC. However, both HIF-1 alpha and HIF-2 alpha showed promoting roles in tumor angiogenesis and growth, and therapeutic outcome may benefit from combined targeting of HIF-1 alpha and HIF-2 alpha. Clin Cancer Res; 16(19); 4732-41. (C) 2010 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available