4.7 Review

Therapeutic Potential of Janus-activated Kinase-2 Inhibitors for the Management of Myelofibrosis

Journal

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 16, Issue 7, Pages 1988-1996

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2836

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P30CA016672] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NCI NIH HHS [P30 CA016672] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Myelofibrosis (either primary or postpolycythemia vera/essential thrombocythemia) is a chronic and debilitating myeloproliferative neoplasm for which there is no well-accepted standard of care. Clinical manifestations of this disease (e. g., cytopenias, splenomegaly, bone marrow fibrosis) and constitutional symptoms (e. g., hypercatabolic state, fatigue, night sweats, fever) create significant treatment challenges. For example, progressive splenomegaly increases the risk for more serious clinical sequelae (e. g., portal hypertension, splenic infarction). Myelofibrosis arises from hematopoietic stem cells or early progenitor cells. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying its pathogenesis and clinical presentation are poorly understood, delaying the development of effective and targeted treatments. Recent studies have implicated mutations that directly or indirectly lead to the deregulated activation of Janus-activated kinase 2 (JAK2). Appreciation for the activation of JAK2 and the importance of increased levels of circulating proinflammatory cytokines in the pathogenesis and clinical manifestations of myelofibrosis has led to novel therapeutic agents targeting JAKs. This review will briefly discuss the origins of the JAK2 hypothesis, the clinical relevance of JAK2 mutations in myelofibrosis, and recent clinical progress in targeting JAKs as a therapeutic intervention for patients with this chronic and debilitating disease. Clin Cancer Res; 16(7); 1988-96. (C)2010 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available