4.7 Article

Noninvasive Detection of EGFR T790M in Gefitinib or Erlotinib Resistant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Journal

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages 2630-2636

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-2592

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH [RO1CA114465-03]
  2. National Cancer Institute Lung SPORE [P50CA090578]
  3. Hazel and Samuel Bellin research fund
  4. Department of Defense [W81 XOSH06-1-0303]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Tumors from 50% of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant non - small cell lung cancer patients that develop resistance to gefitinib or erlotinib will contain a secondary EGFR T790M mutation. As most patients do not undergo repeated tumor biopsies we evaluated whether EGFR T790M could be detected using plasma DNA. Experimental Design: DNA from plasma of 54 patients with known clinical response to gefitinib or erlotinib was extracted and used to detect both EGFR-activating and EGFR T790M mutations. Forty-three (80%) of patients had tumor EGFR sequencing (EGFR mutant/wild type: 30/13) and seven patients also had EGFR T790M gefitinib/erlotinib-resistant tumors. EGFR mutations were detected using two methods, the Scorpion Amplification Refractory Mutation System and the WAVE/Surveyor, combined with whole genome amplification. Results: Both EGFR-activating and EGFR T790M were identified in 70% of patients with known tumor EGFR-activating (21 of 30) or T790M (5 of 7) mutations. EGFR T790M was identified from plasma DNA in 54% (15 of 28) of patients with prior clinical response to gefitinib/erlotinib, 29% (4 of 14) with prior stable disease, and in 0% (0 of 12) that had primary progressive disease or were untreated with gefitinib/erlotinib. Conclusions: EGFR T790M can be detected using plasma DNA from gefitinib- or erlotinib-resistant patients. This noninvasive method may aid in monitoring drug resistance and in directing the course of subsequent therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available