4.7 Article

Identification of Novel Kinase Targets for the Treatment of Estrogen Receptor-Negative Breast Cancer

Journal

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 15, Issue 20, Pages 6327-6340

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1107

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P50 CA058183-090011, P50 CA058183, P50 CA 58183] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Previous gene expression profiling studies of breast cancer have focused on the entire genome to identify genes differentially expressed between estrogen receptor (ER) a-positive and ER-a-negative cancers. Experimental Design: Here, we used gene expression microarray profiling to identify a distinct kinase gene expression profile that identifies ER-negative breast tumors and subsets ER-negative breast tumors into four distinct subtypes. Results: Based on the types of kinases expressed in these clusters, we identify a cell cycle regulatory subset, a S6 kinase pathway cluster, an immunomodulatory kinase-expressing cluster, and a mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway cluster. Furthermore, we show that this specific kinase profile is validated using independent sets of human tumors and is also seen in a panel of breast cancer cell lines. Kinase expression knockdown studies show that many of these kinases are essential for the growth of ER-negative, but not ER-positive, breast cancer cell lines. Finally, survival analysis of patients with breast cancer shows that the S6 kinase pathway signature subtype of ER-negative cancers confers an extremely poor prognosis, whereas patients whose tumors express high levels of immunomodulatory kinases have a significantly better prognosis. Conclusions: This study identifies a list of kinases that are prognostic and may serve as druggable targets for the treatment of ER-negative breast cancer. (Clin Cancer Res 2009; 15(20):63 27-40)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available