4.7 Article

Considerations for the Use of Imaging Tools for Phase II Treatment Trials in Oncology

Journal

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages 1891-1897

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-2030

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [U10 CA029511-30, U10 CA029511] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the context of assessing tumor response, imaging tools have the potential to play a vital role in phase II and III treatment trials. If the imaging test is able to predict potential phase III success in a reliable fashion, it would be a useful tool in phase II trial design as it may provide for a more rapid and timely response assessment. The benefits and challenges of using anatomic imaging measures as well as the promising molecular imaging measures, primarily fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography, are discussed here. The general issues related to successful implementation of advanced imaging in the context of phase II treatment trials are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available