4.7 Article

Diabodies Targeting Epithelial Membrane Protein 2 Reduce Tumorigenicity of Human Endometrial Cancer Cell Lines

Journal

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 14, Issue 22, Pages 7367-7377

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1016

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH [HD48540, CA86306, CA009120, 2-T32-Al-07323]
  2. University of California at Los Angeles Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center flow cytometry core [CA016042]
  3. Iris Cantor Seed Grant, Giannini Family Foundation [U54 CA119367]
  4. Oppenheimer Family Foundation
  5. Center for the Prevention of Eye Disease

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy. One promising biomarker is epithelial membrane protein 2 (EMP2), and its expression is an independent prognostic indicator for tumors with poor clinical outcome expression. The present study assesses the suitability of EMP2 as a therapeutic target. Experimental Design: Human monovalent anti-EMP2 antibody fragments were isolated from a human phage display library and engineered as bivalent antibody fragments (diabodies) with specificity and avidity to both EMP2 peptides and native cell-surface EMP2 protein. Diabodies were assessed using cell death and apoptosis assays. In addition, the efficacy of EMP2 diabodies on endometrial cancer tumors was determined using mouse xenograft models. Results: Treatment of human endometrial adenocarcinoma cell lines with anti-EMP2 diabodies induced significant cell death and caspase-3 cleavage in vitro. These responses correlated with cellular EMP2 expression and were augmented by progesterone, which physiologically induces EMP2 expression. In vivo, treatment of subcutaneous human xenografts of HEC-1A cell lines with anti-EMP2 diabodies suppressed tumor growth and induced cell death in the xenograft. Conclusions: These findings suggest that EMP2 may be a potential pharmacologic target for human endometrial cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available