4.7 Article

Association of p16 homozygous deletions with clinicopathologic characteristics and EGFR/KRAS/p53 mutations in lung adenocarcinoma

Journal

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages 3746-3753

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4552

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: The p16 gene is frequently inactivated in lung adenocarcinoma. In particular, homozygous deletions (HD) have been frequently detected in cell lines; however, their frequency and specificity is not well-established in primary tumors. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the prevalence and the timing for the occurrence of p16 HDs in lung adenocarcinoma progression in vivo. Experimental Design: Multiple ligation-dependent probe amplification was used for the detection of p16 HDs in 28 primary small-sized lung adenocarcinomas and 22 metastatic lung adenocarcinomas to the brain. Cancer cells were isolated from primary adenocarcinoma specimens by laser capture microdissection. HDs were confirmed by quantitative real-time genomic PCR analysis. Results: HDs were detected in 8 of 28 (29%) primary tumors, including 2 of 8 (25%) noninvasive bronchioloalveolar carcinomas, and 5 of 22 (26%) brain metastases, respectively. No significant associations were observed between p16 HDs and gender, age, smoking history, stage, and prognosis. HDs were detected with similar frequencies (17-29%) among adenocarcinomas with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, with KRAS mutations, and without EGFR/KRAS mutations, and with similar frequencies (22-28%) between adenocarcinomas with and without p53 mutations. Conclusions: p16 HDs occur early in the development of lung adenocarcinomas and with similar frequencies among EGFR type, KRAS type, and non-EGFR/KRAS type lung adenocarcinomas. Tobacco carcinogens would not be a major factor inducing p16 HDs in lung adenocarcinoma progression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available