4.7 Article

Phase I Trial of Erlotinib Combined with Cisplatin and Radiotherapy for Patients with Locally Advanced Cervical Squamous Cell Cancer

Journal

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 14, Issue 19, Pages 6324-6329

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-5112

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: This phase I trial was aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose and related toxicity of erlotinib (E) when administered concurrently with standard chemoradiation (CRT) for cervical cancer. Experimental Design: In a modified Fibonacci design, the study aimed to study three cohorts of at least three patients receiving escalating doses of erlotinib (50/100/150 mg) combined with cisplatin (40 mg/m(2), weekly, 5 cycles) and radiotherapy (external beam 4,500 cGy in 25 fractions, followed by 4 fractions/600 cGy/weekly of brachytherapy) in squamous cell cervical carcinoma patients, stage IIIB to IIIB. Results: Fifteen patients were enrolled, 3 at dose level (DL) 50 mg, 4 at DL100 mg, and 8 at DL 150 mg. Patients presented median age 47 (36-59), stage IIIB (46.2%) and 1IIIB (53.8%). Overall, E+CRTwas well-tolerated. Three patients did not complete the planned schedule. One patient at DL 100 mg withdrew informed consent due to grade 2 rash; at DL 150 mg, 1 patient presented Raynaud's Syndrome and had C interrupted, and another patient presented grade 4 hepatotoxicity. The latter was interpreted as dose limiting toxicity and a new cohort of 150 mg was started. No further grade 4 toxicity occurred. Grade 3 toxicity occurred in 6 cases: diarrhea in 3 patients, rash in 2 patients, and leukopenia in 1 patient. E+CRT did not lead to limiting in-field toxicity. Conclusions: E+CRT is feasible to locally advanced squamous cell cervical cancer and is well tolerated. The maximum tolerated dose has been defined as 150 mg. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a combination of erlotinib, cisplatin, and pelvic radiotherapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available