4.3 Article

Measurement of shoulder joint loads during wheelchair propulsion measured in vivo

Journal

CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS
Volume 26, Issue 10, Pages 982-989

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2011.05.017

Keywords

Shoulder joint; Load measurement; Shoulder load; In vivo; Wheelchair; Instrumented implant; Forces; Moments; Telemetry

Funding

  1. Synthes Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Recent in vivo measurements show that the loads acting in the glenohumeral joint are high even during activities of daily living. Wheelchair users are frequently affected by shoulder problems. With previous musculoskeletal shoulder models, shoulder joint loading was mostly calculated during well-defined activities like forward flexion or abduction. For complex movements of everyday living or wheelchair propulsion, the reported loads vary considerably. Methods: Shoulder joint forces and moments were measured with telemeterized implants in 6 subjects. Data were captured on a treadmill at defined speeds and inclinations. Additional measurements were taken in 1 subject when lifting the body from the wheelchair, using his arms only, and in 2 subjects when rapidly accelerating and stopping the wheelchair. The influence of the floor material on shoulder joint loading was accessed in 2 subjects. In general, the maximum shoulder loads did not exceed those during daily living but the time courses and magnitudes of the loads intra-individually varied much. Findings: The highest forces acted during maximum acceleration and lifting from the wheelchair (128% and 188% of body weight). Grass was the only surface which led to a general load increase, compared to a smooth floor. Interpretation: The increased incidence of overuse injuries in wheelchair users are probably not caused by excessive load magnitudes during regular propulsion. The high number of repetitions is assumed to be more decisive. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available