4.3 Article

From first to last steps in life - Pressure patterns of three generations

Journal

CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages 676-681

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.06.001

Keywords

Pressure distribution; Foot; Age; Generation

Funding

  1. DFG (German Research Foundation) [RO 2146/3-4]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The human foot has to bear loads during all kinds of bipedal locomotion throughout the whole life. Rapid developmental changes of foot morphology and foot function occur during the first years of walking. Furthermore, disease dependent modifications can also have an influence on plantar loading. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that foot function will undergo changes in life. However, the main differences between the pressure patterns in young and elderly have not been well described. The aim of the study was to evaluate age-dependent pressure patterns in different age-related stages. Methods: Hundred and four healthy humans of four different age groups were retrospectively analysed by means of plantar pressure measurements (toddlers: mean age 1.0 (SD 0.2) year; 7-year olds: 7.0 (SD 0.4) years; adults: 31.9 (SD 2.1) years; seniors: 68.7 (SD 3.2) years). The emed (R) pressure platform was used to evaluate peak pressure, maximum force, contact time, contact area and arch index. Findings: Significant differences were found for each parameter between almost every age group. The highest peak pressure values were observed for the seniors'(P < 0.001). Peak pressures are low in toddlers (145 kPa), high in 7-year olds and adults (400-600 kPa) and even higher in elderly (>= 800 kPa). Interpretation: Elderly adults can still be functionally mobile even if pressures are high. The results for the investigated age groups can be used as normative foot loading data to compare to pathological foot function. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available