4.3 Article

Gender differences in walking and running on level and inclined surfaces

Journal

CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages 1260-1268

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.07.011

Keywords

Gender differences; Walking and running mechanics; Kinematics; Hip muscles; EMG; Anthropometry

Funding

  1. NSF Graduate Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Gender differences in kinematics during running have been speculated to be a contributing factor to the lower extremity injury rate disparity between men and women. Specifically, increased non-sagittal motion of the pelvis and hip has been implicated; however it is not known if this difference exists under a variety of locomotion conditions. The purpose of this study was to characterize gender differences in gait kinematics and muscle activities as a function of speed and surface incline and to determine if lower extremity anthropometrics contribute to these differences. Methods. Whole body kinematics of 34 healthy volunteers were recorded along with electromyography of muscles on the right lower limb while each subject walked at 1.2, 1.5, and 1.8 m/s and ran at 1.8, 2.7, and 3.6 m/s with surface inclinations of 0%, 10%, and 15% grade. Joint angles and muscle activities were compared between genders across each speed-incline condition. Pelvis and lower extremity segment lengths were also measured and compared. Findings. Females displayed greater peak hip internal rotation and adduction, as well as gluteus maximus activity for all conditions. Significant interactions (speed-gender, incline-gender) were present for the gluteus medius and vastus lateralis. Hip adduction during walking was moderately correlated to the ratio of bi-trochanteric width to leg length. Interpretation. Our findings indicate females display greater non-sagittal motion. Future studies are needed to better define the relationship of these differences to injury risk. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available