4.5 Article

Analytical performance evaluation of the scanning capillary tube viscometer for measurement of whole blood viscosity

Journal

CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 46, Issue 1-2, Pages 139-142

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2012.10.015

Keywords

Whole blood viscosity; Analytical performance; Evaluation; Viscometer; Capillary tube viscometer

Funding

  1. Konkuk University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Whole blood viscosity (WBV) is the resistance of blood flow in blood vessels. Increased WBV may be a cardiovascular risk factor. The proper screening of WBV can help the early detection of cardiovascular disease. We investigated the performance of a new scanning capillary tube viscometer (SCTV) for the measurement of WBV. Methods: We evaluated the total precision of the SCTV for 20 days using three control viscosity materials, and the within-day precision with the whole blood samples of three different individuals. For the linearity evaluation, serial dilutions of a high concentration standard material were used. For the method comparison, the results of the SCTV method were compared to those of Brookfield rotating viscometer on 227 subjects. Results: The SCTV had good within-run and total-run coefficient of variant (CV)s at low-, medium-, and high-concentration samples, at shear rates of 1 and 300 s(-1). The within-day CVs with the three human blood samples were 6.3%, 3.7% and 3.8% at a shear rate of 1 s(-1), and 3.2%, 3.0% and 4.1% at a shear rate of 300 s(-1). The SCTV method showed an excellent linearity in the range of 84.9 to 558.2 milliPoise (mP) and 28.8 to 71.0 mP at shear rates of 1 and 300 s(-1), respectively. For the comparison study, the SCTV and the rotating viscometer showed comparable results. Conclusions: The SCTV showed a stable analytical performance, and was comparable with the rotational viscometer. This new SCTV method can be used in the clinical laboratory for various needs. (C) 2012 The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available