3.9 Article

Gender-dependent HLA-DR-restricted epitopes identified from herpes simplex virus type 1 glycoprotein D

Journal

CLINICAL AND VACCINE IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages 1436-1449

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/CVI.00123-08

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Public Health Service [EY14900, EY15225, EY16663]
  2. Discovery Eye Foundation
  3. Henry L. Guenther Foundation
  4. Research to Prevent Blindness Challenge
  5. NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE [R24EY016663, R01EY015225, R01EY014900] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent clinical trials, a herpes simplex virus (HSV) recombinant glycoprotein D (gD) vaccine was more efficacious in woman than in men. Here we report six HLA-DR-restricted T-cell gD epitope peptides that bind to multiple HLA-DR (DR1, DR4, DR7, DR13, DR15, and DRB5) molecules that represent a large proportion of the human population. Four of these peptides recalled naturally primed CD4(+) T cells in up to 45% of the 46 HSV-seropositive, asymptomatic individuals studied. For the gD(49-82), gD(77-104), and gD(121-152) peptides, the CD4(+) T-cell responses detected in HSV-seropositive, asymptomatic women were higher and more frequent than the responses detected in men. Immunization of susceptible DRB1*0101 transgenic mice with a mixture of three newly identified, gender-dependent, immunodominant epitope peptides (gD49-82, gD77-104, and gD121-152) induced a gender- and CD4(+) T-cell-dependent immunity against ocular HSV type 1 challenge. These results revealed a gender- dependent T-cell response to a discrete set of gD epitopes and suggest that while a T-cell epitope-based HSV vaccine that targets a large percentage of the human population may be feasible with a limited number of immunodominant promiscuous HLA-DR-restricted epitopes, gender should be taken into account during evaluations of such vaccines.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available