4.3 Article

A distinct AMP-activated protein kinase phosphorylation site characterizes cardiac hypertrophy induced by l-thyroxine and angiotensin II

Journal

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2010.05404.x

Keywords

AMP-activated protein kinase; angiotensin II; cardiac hypertrophy; l-thyroxine; phosphorylation

Funding

  1. National Key Basic Research Program of China [2006CB503806]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [30672466, 30821001]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Beijing [7082101]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

P>1. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate differences in the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) phosphorylation sites in cardiac hypertrophy induced by l-thyroxine and angiotensin (Ang) II. 2. Cardiac hypertrophy was induced in wild-type and AMPK alpha 2-knockout mice by treatment with 1 mg/kg, i.p., thyroxine or 1.44 mg/kg per day AngII for 14 days. The phenotype of the hypertrophy was evaluated using echocardiographic measurments and histological analyses. The phosphorylation of AMPK at alpha-Ser485/491 and alpha-Thr172 was determined by western blot analysis. 3. In wild-type mice, the phosphorylation of AMPK alpha-Ser485/491 was significantly elevated in the AngII-treated group, but not in the thyroxine-reated group, compared with the vehicle control group. In contrast, the phosphorylation of AMPK alpha-Thr172 was significantly increased by thyroxine, but not AngII, treatment compared with the vehicle control group. Furthermore, knockout of the AMPK alpha 2 subunit abolished phosphorylation at the alpha-Ser485/491 site and significantly suppressed phosphorylation at the alpha-Thr172 site, resulting in alleviation of thyroxine- but not AngII-induced hypertrophy. 4. In conclusion, l-thyroxine and AngII induce the phosphorylation of distinct sites of AMPK in cardiac hypertrophy. Phosphorylation of AMPK alpha-Thr172 may contribute to thyroxine-induced cardiac hypertrophy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available