4.3 Article

Renal functional responses to ischaemia-reperfusion injury in normotensive and hypertensive rats following non-selective and selective cyclo-oxygenase inhibition with nitric oxide donation

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2007.04739.x

Keywords

cyclo-oxygenase inhibitors; hypertension; nitric oxide; renal ischaemia-reperfusion injury

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Acute renal failure develops as a result of periods of renal ischaemia during cardiovascular surgery or hypovolaemic shock. The present study investigated the importance of endogenous prostaglandin production and nitric oxide (NO) in the renal haemodynamic and excretory responses to ischaemia-reperfusion both normally and in the hypertensive state by chronic administration of cyclo-oxygenase (COX) inhibitors. Male Wistar and stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRSP) were subjected to 30 min renal ischaemia and 2 h reperfusion following 7 day treatment with vehicle, aspirin, NO-aspirin or celecoxib. Renal blood flow was higher in the SHRSP treatment groups. Renal ischaemia increased blood pressure in all Wistar groups except that given aspirin, had no effect in the SHRSP and did not change renal blood flow in any group. Glomerular filtration rate was reduced throughout the reperfusion period in both rat strains. The postischaemic diuresis in the Wistar was enhanced by COX-2 inhibition, but not by aspirin or NO-aspirin. Urine flow increased in SHRSP during the postischaemic period, which was blunted by aspirin and NO-aspirin, but not by celecoxib. There was a postischaemic increase in fractional sodium excretion, the magnitude of which was unaltered by any drug in the Wistar rats, but was blunted by aspirin, NO-aspirin and celecoxib in SHRSP. These results suggest that products of COX activity contribute to the renal responses to ischaemia-reperfusion injury, but in different ways, in SHRSP, which may reflect variations in renal prostaglandin and NO production in the hypertensive state.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available