4.5 Article

Rise of intraocular pressure in a caffeine test versus the water drinking test in patients with glaucoma

Journal

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 42, Issue 5, Pages 427-432

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ceo.12259

Keywords

caffeine; glaucoma; intraocular pressure; water drinking

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: There is increasing emphasis on the importance of intraocular pressure peaks and fluctuations as risk factors for glaucoma progression. It is well recognized that the water drinking test raises intraocular pressure and there is reasonable evidence that caffeine can also raise intraocular pressure. The aim of this study is to directly compare the effect of a caffeine test to that of the water drinking test on intraocular pressure, in patients with glaucoma. Design: Prospective, observer-masked, cross-over study. Participants: Fourteen eyes of 14 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Methods: Patients were initially randomized to either caffeine test or water drinking test. Intraocular pressure was measured in both eyes with a Goldmann applanation tonometer at baseline and every 15 min for 1 h, by a masked examiner. This was repeated the following week at the same time of day for the other test (the cross-over). Peak intraocular pressure and maximum fluctuation from baseline were compared between groups using paired t-tests. Main Outcome Measures: Peak and fluctuation of intraocular pressure, time of maximum frequency of peak intraocular pressure. Results: The maximum intraocular pressure from the water drinking test (19.7 +/- 4.1) was greater than the caffeine test (16.7 +/- 4.1) and showed greater fluctuation in intraocular pressure (4.3 +/- 2.7 mmHg [27.7%]; P < 0.0001) compared with the caffeine test (1.8 +/- 1.9 mmHg [11.7%]); P = 0.004). Conclusion: The rise in intraocular pressure was greater with water drinking test than the caffeine test. Caffeine does not appear to provide an alternative for patients unable to tolerate the water drinking test.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available