4.6 Article

Natural resistance to apoptosis correlates with resistance to chemotherapy in colorectal cancer cells

Journal

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages 97-103

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10238-011-0146-5

Keywords

Apoptosis; Chemoresistance; Colorectal cancer; 5-fluorouracil; Oxaliplatin

Funding

  1. Shihezi University [0263-6000601]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2009BAI82B02, 2009BAI82B03]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Defects in apoptotic machinery vary among individual cancer cells, and the efficacy of chemotherapy in killing cancer cells depends on the successful induction of apoptosis. This study tested the hypothesis that the intrinsic ability of a cancer cell's natural resistance to apoptosis would indicate its ability in resistance to chemotherapy. Four widely studied human colorectal cancer cell lines, SW480, HT-29, LoVo and Caco-2, were examined for their apoptotic fates in spontaneous cultures for up to 6 days using flowcytometry. Chemoresponse of these cells was tested against anti-colorectal cancer drugs 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and oxaliplatin (OXP) at different peak plasma concentrations (PPCs) using MTT assay. Apoptosis analyses demonstrated that, from Day 2 to Day 6 in spontaneous cultures, SW480 and HT-29 lines showed resistance to apoptosis by having much less average early and late apoptotic cells than LoVo and Caco-2 lines with differences of 3.2- to 5.2-fold. Interestingly, apoptosis-resistant SW480 and HT-29 exhibited higher chemoresistance to both 5-FU (P < 0.01 at 5x, 10x, and 50x PPC) and OXP (P < 0.01 at 5x and 10x PPC, and P < 0.05 at 50x PPC) than LoVo and Caco-2. Colorectal cancer cells' natural resistance to apoptosis is an intrinsic ability that correlates with resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs 5-FU and OXP. Cancer cells' natural apoptotic phenotypes may help predict the outcome of chemotherapy in colorectal cancers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available