4.5 Article

Toll-like receptors and CD40 modulate each other's expression affecting Leishmania major infection

Journal

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 176, Issue 2, Pages 283-290

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/cei.12264

Keywords

Leishmania; CD40; Toll-like receptor; macrophages

Categories

Funding

  1. Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi
  2. University Grant Commission, New Delhi
  3. Department of Biotechnology, New Delhi [BT/PR/3288/BRB/10/966/2011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Toll-like receptors (TLRs) recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns and results in innate immune system activation that results in elicitation of the adaptive immune response. One crucial modulator of the adaptive immune response is CD40. However, whether these molecules influence each other's expression and functions is not known. Therefore, we examined the effects of TLRs on CD40 expression on macrophages, the host cell for the protozoan parasite Leishmania major. While polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid [poly (I:C)], a TLR-3 ligand, lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a TLR-4 ligand, imiquimod, a TLR-7/8 ligand and cytosine-phosphate-guanosine (CpG), a TLR-9 ligand, were shown to enhance CD40 expression, CD40 stimulation enhanced only TLR-9 expression. Therefore, we tested the synergism between CD40 and CpG in anti-leishmanial immune response. In Leishmania-infected macrophages, CpG was found to reduce CD40-induced extracellular stress-regulated kinase (ERK)1/2 activation; with the exception of interleukin (IL)-10, these ligands had differential effects on CD40-induced IL-1 alpha, IL-6 and IL-12 production. CpG significantly enhanced the anti-leishmanial function of CD40 with differential effects on IL-4, IL-10 and interferon (IFN)-gamma production in susceptible BALB/c mice. Thus, we report the first systematic study on CD40-TLR cross-talk that regulated the experimental L. major infection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available