4.5 Article

Regulatory T cells in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients are elevated and independent of immunological and virological status, as well as initiation of highly active anti-retroviral therapy

Journal

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 154, Issue 1, Pages 80-86

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2008.03725.x

Keywords

flow cytometry; FACS; highly active anti-retroviral therapy; HIV; immune regulation; Tregs

Categories

Funding

  1. University of Copenhagen

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) causes a dysregulation of the immune system. This is caused by HIV-specific as well as non-specific mechanisms and has not been explained fully. In particular, knowledge is lacking about the potential role of host-mediated immunosuppressive mechanisms. During recent years it has become evident that a subpopulation of T cells [T regulatory (T-regs)] play a major role in sustaining tolerance to self-antigens. To investigate the influence of initiation of highly active anti-retroviral therapy (HAART) on the T-reg level in HIV-infected patients we have conducted a prospective study enrolling treatment-naive HIV-infected patients just prior to starting treatment with HAART, measuring levels of T-regs by flow cytometry and mRNA expression of forkhead box P3 (FoxP3) at weeks 0, 4, 12 and 24 of treatment. In this prospective study neither the percentage of CD4(+)CD25(high+) nor the expression of FoxP3 changed significantly during 24 weeks of HAART. Furthermore, HIV patients have higher T-regs measured as percentages of CD4(+)CD25(high+) cells paralleled by higher levels of FoxP3 compared with healthy controls. The elevated level of T-regs was found to be independent of both immunological and virological status, indicating that initiation of HAART has minor effects on the T-reg level in HIV-infected patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available