4.5 Article

Characterization of prodromal symptoms in a large population of patients with hereditary angio-oedema

Journal

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY
Volume 39, Issue 3, Pages 298-303

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ced.12285

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. CSL Behring GmbH (Hattersheim, Germany)
  2. International Center for Angioedema Research (iCARE, Berlin, Germany)
  3. Urticaria Network eV (UNEV)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundHereditary angio-oedema (HAE) due to C1-inhibitor (C1-INH) deficiency is a rare autosomal dominant disease. It predisposes affected patients to attacks of disfiguring, painful angio-oedema, which, in cases of involvement of the upper airways, can be life-threatening. Frequently, prodromal symptoms occur hours to days before an attack, but their predictive value is uncertain. AimTo characterize the spectrum of prodromal symptoms in patients with HAE in Germany. MethodsA questionnaire asking about the frequency, type and time of occurrence of prodromal symptoms, and the interval until the onset of an attack of HAE was sent to 808 German patients with HAE. Answers from 365 participating patients were analysed. ResultsThe survey showed that 79% of patients with HAE had experienced 1 prodromal symptom before an attack of angio-oedema. The most commonly reported prodromal symptoms (67% of which occurred within 6h before an attack) were fatigue, malaise and short temper. Significantly more women than men reported having prodromes (83% vs. 73%, P<0.05). Over 90% of the patients with prodromes reported that they were able to predict the onset of an attack with a certainty of 50%. In addition, there was a significant correlation between the occurrence of skin rashes and delay in the diagnosis of HAE. ConclusionsThe results of this survey may aid the management of C1-HAE by recognizing that prodromal symptoms are of value in predicting the onset of an attack of angio-oedema and in diagnosing the condition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available