4.5 Article

Aminopenicillin-associated exanthem: lymphocyte transformation testing revisited

Journal

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY
Volume 44, Issue 12, Pages 1531-1538

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/cea.12437

Keywords

adverse drug reaction; challenge test; delayed onset; drug allergy; drug hypersensitivity; lymphocyte transformation test; penicillin; provocation test

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundThe lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) has been promoted as in-vitro test for diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity. For determination of statistical LTT sensitivity, series of patients with clinically uniform reactions followed by complete drug hypersensitivity work-up are mandatory. Assessment of LTT specificity requires control patients who tolerated exposure to the drug studied. ObjectiveTo prospectively determine the diagnostic value of the LTT in a clinically and diagnostically well-defined series of patients. MethodsPatients with exanthematous skin eruptions after ampicillin (AMP) intake were included in this study. After exclusion or confirmation of delayed-onset allergic AMP hypersensitivity by skin and provocation testing, two independent LTTs were performed: one standard LTT and a modified LTT with additional anti-CD3/anti-CD28 monoclonal antibody stimulation. ResultsBy testing, delayed-onset allergic AMP hypersensitivity was diagnosed in 11 patients and definitely ruled out in 26. The standard LTT reached a diagnostic sensitivity of 54.5% while the modified LTT yielded 72.7%. However, the methodical test modification resulted in a decline of specificity from 92.3% (standard LTT) to 76.9%. Conclusions and Clinical RelevanceIn cases of AMP-associated exanthems, the diagnostic value of the LTT compared with routine allergy testing is limited. When evaluating such exanthems, provocation testing remains the gold standard. Delayed reading of intradermal skin tests remains most useful to avoid positive provocation reactions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available