4.4 Article

Combined preoperative CEA and CD44v6 improves prognostic value in patients with stage I and stage II colorectal cancer

Journal

CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages 285-292

Publisher

SPRINGER INT PUBL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s12094-013-1069-2

Keywords

CEA; CD44v6; Colorectal cancer; Prognosis

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81272766, 81071658]
  2. Capital Medical Development and Research Foundation [2009-2093]
  3. Clinical Characteristics and Application Research of Capital (Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission) [Z121107001012130]
  4. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [7132054]
  5. New Star of Science and Technology Program of Beijing (Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission) [2011060]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Combination of biomarkers may improve diagnosis and have better prognostic value than single markers. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether combined CEA and CD44v6 improves prognostic value in stage I and stage II (stage I/II) colorectal cancer (CRC). Preoperative serum CEA level and the expression of CD44v6 in CRC tissues were examined by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay and immunohistochemistry, respectively. The association of CEA and CD44v6 with clinicopathological features and their possible prognostic values was analyzed. The preoperative elevated serum CEA level and positive CD44v6 expression were detected in 30.1 % (52/173) serum samples and 60.5 % (101/167) CRC tissues, respectively. Patients with an elevated-CEA level or a CD44v6-negative tumor had a worse disease-specific survival (DSS) than those with a normal-CEA level or CD44v6-positive tumor (P = 0.024, P = 0.012, respectively). Moreover, CD44v6 expression could be used in discriminating patients from good to poor prognosis in normal-CEA subgroup (P = 0.043), but not in elevated-CEA subgroup (P = 0.563). Multivariate analysis revealed that combined CEA and CD44v6 was an independent prognostic factor for patients with stage I/II CRC (P = 0.023). However, serum CEA level only retained a borderline significance for correlation with a worse DSS (P = 0.059), and CD44v6 expression alone was not an independent prognostic factor for DSS in multivariate analysis (P = 0.123). These results suggested that combined CEA/CD44v6 had better prognostic value than CEA or CD44v6 alone for patients with stage I/II CRC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available