4.4 Article

A study of circulating anti-CD25 antibodies in non-small cell lung cancer

Journal

CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages 633-637

Publisher

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/s12094-012-0980-2

Keywords

Autoantibody; Biomarker; CD25; Lung cancer; Tumor immunity

Categories

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Bureau of Heilongjiang Province, Harbin, China [GB05C401-11]
  2. Glory Biomedical Co. Ltd, Taiwan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tumors can trigger specific immune response to tumor-associated antigens but the precise mechanism remains unclear. Since regulatory T-lymphocytes (Treg) play a crucial role in controlling autoimmune responses, the present work was undertaken to test whether dysfunction of Treg cells could be involved in developing autoimmunity in patients with lung cancer. In this study, we developed an in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to test circulating anti-CD25 autoantibodies among 272 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and 226 control subjects matched in age, gender and smoking history. Mann-Whitney U test showed that the anti-CD25 IgG level was significantly higher in patients with NSCLC than control subjects (Z = -7.48, P < 0.001) while the anti-CD25 IgA level was not significantly changed in the patient group as compared with the control group (Z = -1.34, P = 0.181). Spearman correlation analysis failed to reveal a significant correlation between the levels of anti-CD25 IgG and IgA either in patients with NSCLC (r = -0.034, P = 0.578) or in control subjects (r = 0.055, P = 0.429). ROC analysis showed an AUC of 0.70 for anti-CD25 IgG, in which NSCLC at stage III had the highest AUC (0.75). The sensitivity against a specificity of > 90 % was 35.0 % for anti-CD25 IgG assay with an inter-assay deviation of 9.4 %, and 4.0 % for anti-CD25 IgA assay with an inter-assay deviation of 13.0 %. Circulating anti-CD25 IgG antibody may be a useful biomarker for prognosis of lung cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available