4.4 Article

JAK/STAT signal pathway activation promotes progression and survival of human oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Journal

CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages 143-149

Publisher

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/s12094-012-0774-6

Keywords

Oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma; JAK/STAT pathway; Prognosis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective Inappropriate activation of JAK/STAT pathway occurs with high frequency in human cancers and is associated with cancer cell survival and proliferation. However, its role in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is unknown. Methods By immunohistochemistry, we analysed the expression of two components of this pathway, phosphorylated JAK-1 (pJAK-1) and phosphorylated STAT-3 (pSTAT-3), in 100 ESCC tumours and paired non-neoplastic oesophageal epithelia. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate the prognosis of patients. Results We found that pJAK-1 and pSTAT-3 expression was not detectable in normal oesophageal squamous cells. Primary ESCC with pJAK-1-positive and pSTAT-3-positive expression was detected in the cancer cell nests of 78 and 72 cases, respectively. In addition, the Pearson's correlation coefficient between pJAK-1 and pSTAT-3 expression was 0.806 (p<0.001). Moreover, pJAK-1 and pSTAT-3 expression was correlated with N stage (lymph node metastasis, both p=0.01), pTNM stage (p=0.008 and 0.009, respectively) and metastatic status (both p=0.01). Furthermore, pJAK-1 and pSTAT-3 expression was associated with shorter overall survival (both p<0.001) and shorter disease-free survival (p=0.005 and 0.006, respectively). By multivariate analysis, TNM clinical classification (T, p<0.001; N, p=0.002; M, p=0.02), pJAK-1 (p=0.002) and pSTAT-3 (p=0.003) were independent prognosis predictors of ESCC. Conclusion These results provide convincing evidence for the first time that the JAK/STAT pathway may participate in the progress of ESCC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available