4.4 Article

A phase II trial of first-line sorafenib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma unwilling to receive or with early intolerance to immunotherapy: SOGUG Study 06-01

Journal

CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages 503-508

Publisher

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/s12094-010-0544-2

Keywords

Angiogenesis inhibitors; Cytokines; Renal cell carcinoma; Sorafenib

Categories

Funding

  1. Bayer Schering Pharma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Our aim was to evaluate first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) with sorafenib in patients unwilling to receive immunotherapy or with early intolerance to immunotherapy. Patients had clear-cell mRCC with good or intermediate risk status, were unsuited to cytokine therapy due to preference or intolerance (based on < 4 weeks prior immunotherapy) and had not received antiangiogenic agents. Patients received sorafenib 400 mg twice daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Twenty-six evaluable patients were enrolled at six centres between March and July 2006. The most common metastatic sites were lung and bone; nine patients had one or two metastatic lesions. Median PFS was 7.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.1-17.5) and overall survival (OS) 15.4 months (95% CI 12.9-17.4). Among 21 patients evaluable for response, 19 (90.5%) experienced disease control (including one complete response; four partial responses; 14 stable disease). The majority of adverse events were grade 1-2 (87.3%). The most common were asthenia (53.0%) and diarrhoea (50.0%). In patients with mRCC who were unwilling to receive or intolerant to immunotherapy, treatment with sorafenib led to a high rate of disease control with toxicities that were generally mild and manageable. The PFS achieved in this essentially treatment-na < ve population compares favourably with that obtained in the randomised first-line phase II study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available