4.7 Article

Investigation of potential breath biomarkers for the early diagnosis of breast cancer using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

Journal

CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 436, Issue -, Pages 59-67

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2014.04.030

Keywords

Breast cancer; Early diagnosis; Noninvasive diagnosis; Biomarkers; Breath analysis

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [21305095]
  2. National Recruitment Program of Global Experts (NRPGE)
  3. Hundred Talents Program of Sichuan Province (HTPSP)
  4. Startup Funding of Sichuan University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Breast cancer (BC) remains the most commonly diagnosed malignancy in women. We investigated 4 straight aldehydes in the exhaled breath as potential early BC diagnostic biomarkers. Methods: End-tailed breath were collected by Bio-VOC (R) sampler and assayed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance test and binary logistic regression were used for data analysis. The diagnostic accuracies were evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curves. A predictive model/equation was generated using the 4 biomarkers and validated by leave-one-out cross-validation. Results: All four potential biomarkers demonstrated significant differences in concentrations between BC and healthy controls (HC) (p < 0.05). The areas under the curves (AUCs) in HC vs BCI-II model using hexanal, heptanal, octanal, and nonanal were 0.816, 0.809, 0.731, and 0.830, respectively. The AUC for their combined use was 0.934 (sensitivity 91.7%, specificity 95.8%) in the early diagnosis of BC The predictive model/equation exhibited good sensitivity (72.7%) and specificity (91.7%) in distinguishing between HC and BC (cross-validation: sensitivity 682% and specificity 91.7%). Conclusions: The diagnostic values of 4 exhaled straight aldehydes as early diagnostic biomarkers for BC were successfully verified and the diagnostic accuracy improved in their combined use. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available