4.7 Review

Hydrogen sulfide as a potent cardiovascular protective agent

Journal

CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 437, Issue -, Pages 78-87

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2014.07.012

Keywords

H2S; CSE; Atherosclerosis; CHD; Heart failure

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81170278, 81370377, 81300224]
  2. Aid Program for Science and Technology Innovative Research Team in Higher Educational Institutions of Hunan Province [2008-244]
  3. construct program of the key discipline in Hunan Province, China [2011-76]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is a well-known toxic gas with the characteristic smell of rotten eggs. It is synthesized endogenously in mammals from the sulfur-containing amino acid L-cysteine by the action of several distinct enzymes: cystathionine-gamma-lyase (CSE), cystathionine-beta-synthase (CBS), and 3-mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase (3-MST) along with cysteine aminotransferase (CAT). In particular, CSE is considered to be the major H2S-producing enzyme in the cardiovascular system. As the third gasotransmitter next to nitric oxide (NO) and carbon monoxide (CO), H2S plays an important role in the regulation of vasodilation, angiogenesis, inflammation, oxidative stress and apoptosis. Growing evidence has demonstrated that this gas exerts a significant protective effect against the progression of cardiovascular diseases by a number of mechanisms such as vasorelaxation, inhibition of cardiovascular remodeling and resistance to form foam cells. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the physiological functions of H2S and its protection against several major cardiovascular diseases, and to explore its potential health and therapeutic benefits. A better understanding will help develop novel H2S-based therapeutic interventions for these diseases. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available