4.7 Article

Development and validation of a serum total testosterone liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assay calibrated to NIST SRM 971

Journal

CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 415, Issue -, Pages 109-117

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2012.10.007

Keywords

Total testosterone; LC-MS/MS; Immunoassay; Standardization

Funding

  1. University of California San Francisco Medical Center
  2. Department of Laboratory Medicine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: At our institution, serum testosterone in adult males is measured by immunoassay while female and pediatric specimens are sent to a reference laboratory for liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analysis due to low concentrations. As this is of significant cost, a testosterone LC-MS/MS assay was developed in-house. Methods: A 5500 QTRA (R) using electrospray ionization and a Shimadzu Prominence with a C18 column were used. Gradient elution with formic acid, water and methanol:acetonitrile at 0.5 rat/min had a 7-min run-time. A liquid-liquid extraction with hexane:ethyl acetate was carried out on 200 mu l of serum. Multiple reaction monitoring was employed. Results: Sample preparation took similar to 80 min for 21 samples. Six calibrators were used (0-1263 ng/dl; concentration assigned by NIST SRM 971) with 3 quality controls (9, 168 and 532 ng/dI). The limits of detection and quantitation were 1 and 2 ng/dl respectively. Extraction recovery was similar to 90% and ion suppression similar to 5%. Within-run and total precision studies yielded <15% CV at the limit of quantitation and <7% CV through the rest of the linear range. Isobaric interferences were baseline separated from testosterone. Method comparisons between this assay, an immunoassay, and another LC-MS/MS assay were completed. Conclusions: An accurate and sensitive LC-MS/MS assay for total testosterone was developed. Bringing this assay in-house reduces turnaround time for clinicians and patients and saves our institution funds. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available