4.7 Article

Role of early cell-free DNA levels decrease as a predictive marker of fatal outcome after severe traumatic brain injury

Journal

CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 414, Issue -, Pages 12-17

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2012.08.001

Keywords

Cell free-DNA; Prognostic marker; Real-time PCR; Traumatic brain injury

Funding

  1. MAPFRE Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Circulating cell-free DNA levels are increased after trauma injury. This increase is higher since the first hours after trauma and may be related with primary outcome. A sensitive and reliable biomarker for patients at higher risk is needed to identify these patients to initiate early intervention. In this way, circulating DNA may be a possible biological marker after severe TBI. Materials and methods: We investigated DNA plasma concentrations after severe traumatic brain injury and during the next 96 h in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) by real time PCR. 65 patients suffering severe TBI were included in the study. Results: Cell-free DNA levels were considerably higher in patients samples compared with voluntary control ones. After the following four days we observed a 51% decrease during the first 24 h and a 71% fall from 48 h. TBI population was stratified for the primary outcome (survivors/non-survivor) and DNA levels decrease ratio was calculated for the first 48 h. A higher decrease in the survivors from 0 h to 24 h compared with the non-survivors was found. A cut-off point of 1.95 ratio was established for the detection of the highest proportions of patients after the TBI that will not survive after the injury with a sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 66%. Conclusions: In summary we showed that severe TBI is associated with elevated cf-DNA levels and we propose that cf-DNA decrease during the first 24 h may predict patient outcome. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available