4.7 Article

Quantitation of HBV covalently closed circular DNA in micro formalin fixed paraffin-embedded liver tissue using rolling circle amplification in combination with real-time PCR

Journal

CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 412, Issue 21-22, Pages 1905-1911

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2011.06.031

Keywords

Hepatitis B virus; cccDNA; Rolling circle amplification; Quantitation

Funding

  1. National 11th Five-Year Special Grand Project for Infectious Diseases [2008ZX10002-011, 2009ZX10004-314]
  2. PLA Clinic High-tech Project [2010GXJS-099]
  3. Capital Medical Development Study Foundation [2009-3057]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The study aimed to develop an effective method to quantitate HBV covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) using small section of formalin fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) liver biopsy. Methods: Plasmid-safe ATP-dependent DNase (PSAD)-treated samples were subjected to rolling circle amplification (RCA) prior to real-time PCR mediated by cccDNA-selective primers. Human beta-actin gene was used as a reference control. Results: Compared to the classical method, i.e.. PSAD digestion + real-time PCR, introduction of RCA increased the lower limit of detection for about 2 logs with good inter- and intra-assay reproducibility. HBV cccDNA was detected in 91.5% (119/130) of the FFPE samples. The cccDNA levels (copy/cell) between FFPE liver tissues and fresh frozen counterpart tissues were comparable. The median of cccDNA level in HBeAg-positive patients was higher than that in HBeAg-negative ones (52.60 vs. 31.25 copies/cell, P<0.01). Intrahepatic cccDNA level was positively correlated with intrahepatic HBV total DNA level, but not obviously correlated with serum HBV DNA or alanine aminotransferase levels. Conclusions: The method could sensitively and specifically quantitate intrahepatic HBV cccDNA in micro FFPE liver biopsy tissue for evaluation of HBV replication status in the liver. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available