4.7 Article

The impact of osteopontin promoter polymorphisms on the risk of calcium urolithiasis

Journal

CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 411, Issue 9-10, Pages 739-743

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2010.02.007

Keywords

Osteopontin; Genetic polymorphism; Urolithiasis; Calcium

Funding

  1. Taiwan National Science Council [NSC 96-2314-B-037-15, NSC 97-2314-B-037-32, NSC 98-2314-B-037-030-MY3]
  2. Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital [KMUH-95-5D41, KMUH97-7R22, KMUH98-8R10]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Osteopontin (OPN) is an important modulator of urolithiasis formation. Three functional polymorphisms (-66T/G, -156delG/G, and -443T/G) on the promoter region of the OPN gene have been found to affect the gene expression and transcriptional activity. This study investigated the association of those three functional polymorphisms with the risk of calcium urolithiasis. Methods: A total of 249 cases diagnosed with calcium urolithiasis and 247 age- and sex-matched healthy controls were recruited from Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital between June, 2003 and February, 2007. All subjects completed a detailed questionnaire survey, and provided blood and urine samples for biochemical evaluations. Three single nucleotide polymorphisms were determined by using TaqMan 5' allelic discrimination assay. Results: In-156delG/G polymorphism, subjects who carried delG allele had a significantly higher risk of developing calcium urolithiasis than those with G allele (odds ratio = 1.39; 95% confidence interval = 1.02-1.90; P = 0.037). In stone cases, subjects with delG/G and delG/delG genotypes also had significantly higher urinary ratio of calcium to OPN than those with GIG genotype (11.8 +/- 15.9 vs 7.08 +/- 5.26, P = 0.021). Conclusions: The -156 delG/G polymorphism of OPN gene could serve as a candidate genetic marker used to evaluate the risk of calcium urolithiasis. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available