4.7 Article

An automated turbulent flow liquid chromatography-isotope dilution mass spectrometry (LC-IDMS) method for quantitation of serum creatinine

Journal

CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 411, Issue 21-22, Pages 1728-1734

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2010.07.013

Keywords

Creatinine; Turbulent flow; Liquid chromatography-isotope; dilution mass spectrometry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background When creatinine concentrations determined by routine clinical assays are in question, reference methods can aid investigation Currently available reference methods are significantly labor-intensive, which prevents implementation in a routine clinical laboratory Methods Creatinine D-3 internal standard was added to serum prior to chromatographic separation A TurboFlow (R) Cyclone MCX column was used for online solid phase extraction (SPE) to remove large biomolecules such as proteins, carbohydrates and phospholipids from the serum specimen. Creatinine and creatinine D-3 were then eluted onto a Hypercarb (porous graphitic carbon) column for separation Analytes were detected using electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry and measured by monitoring parent ions of m/z 114 and 117, respectively Results. Total precision at multiple levels was found to be less than 6% (1.0-7.5 mg/dl). Limit of detection (LOD) was 0.05 mg/dl and limit of quantitation (LOQ) was 020 mg/dl Average recovery was 1075% (0 37-5 95 mg/dl) Analysis of standard reference materials from The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) confirmed accuracy of the method No significant difference was found between the liquid chromatography-isotope dilution mass spectrometry (LC-IDMS) method and the Roche Creatinine Plus enzymatic assay Conclusion The automated turbulent flow LC-IDMS method for quantitation of scrum creatinine is accurate, robust, and easy to perform and may serve as a quick and inexpensive alternative to current creatinine reference methods (C) 2010 Elsevier BV All rights reserved

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available