4.7 Article

Measurement of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25OHD3) and 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 (25OHD2) in human serum using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and its comparison to a radioimmunoassay method

Journal

CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 391, Issue 1-2, Pages 6-12

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2008.01.017

Keywords

25-hydroxyvitamin D; HPLC; LC-MS/MS; radioimmunoassay; RIA; method comparison

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Measurement of vitamin D molecules are important in the management of patients with bone disease. We developed a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method to measure 25OHD(3) and 25OHD(2) in human serum and compared it to the traditionally used DiaSorin radioimmunoassay (RIA). Methods: Serum samples (200 mu l) were treated with acetonitrile and centrifuged to remove protein. An online solid-phase extraction procedure was used. Calibration solutions (5-100 ng/ml) of 25OHD(2) and 25OHD(3) were prepared using 4% albumin in phosphate-buffered saline. Chromatography: C 18 column, isocratic ethanol/water (83/17, v/v). Mass spectrometry system: atmospheric pressure chemical ionization in the positive ion mode. Transitions: 250HD3, m/z 401.4 -> 383.4; 25OHD(2), m/z 413.4 -> 395.4; and the internal standard hexadeuterated-25OHD(3), m/z 407.7 -> 389.7. Results: Detection limits were 0.49 ng/ml (25OHD(3)) and 1.86 ng/ml (25OHD(2)). Intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation (CV) were <7% and <11%, respectively, for 250HD3 and <9% and <16%, respectively, for 25OHD(2). Recovery averaged (SD) 99% (2%) for 25OHD(3) and 95% (0.8%) for 25OHD(2). In a method comparison of 551 specimens from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, the LC-MS/MS method gave values that were on average 13% higher (95%CI: 11-15%) than RIA results. Conclusions: This high throughput candidate reference method requires minimal sample preparation and is suitable for routine use for analysis of vitamin D status. (C) 2008 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available