4.5 Article

Regional projections of the likelihood of very large wildland fires under a changing climate in the contiguous Western United States

Journal

CLIMATIC CHANGE
Volume 126, Issue 3-4, Pages 455-468

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-014-1229-6

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Pacific Northwest Research Station, U.S. Forest Service
  2. Joint Fire Science Program [11-1-7-4]
  3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Seasonal changes in the climatic potential for very large wildfires (VLWF a parts per thousand yenaEuro parts per thousand 50,000 ac similar to 20,234 ha) across the western contiguous United States are projected over the 21st century using generalized linear models and downscaled climate projections for two representative concentration pathways (RCPs). Significant (p a parts per thousand currency signaEuro parts per thousand 0.05) increases in VLWF probability for climate of the mid-21st century (2031-2060) relative to contemporary climate are found, for both RCP 4.5 and 8.5. The largest differences are in the Eastern Great Basin, Northern Rockies, Pacific Northwest, Rocky Mountains, and Southwest. Changes in seasonality and frequency of VLWFs d7epend on changes in the future climate space. For example, flammability-limited areas such as the Pacific Northwest show that (with high model agreement) the frequency of weeks with VLWFs in a given year is 2-2.7 more likely. However, frequency of weeks with at least one VLWF in fuel-limited systems like the Western Great Basin is 1.3 times more likely (with low model agreement). Thus, areas where fire is directly associated with hot and dry climate, as opposed to experiencing lagged effects from previous years, experience more change in the likelihood of VLWF in future projections. The results provide a quantitative foundation for management to mitigate the effects of VLWFs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available