4.3 Article

Melatonin supplementation in rat ameliorates ovariectomy-induced oxidative stress

Journal

CLIMACTERIC
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages 274-283

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/13697137.2012.682108

Keywords

MELATONIN; OXIDATIVE STRESS; CORTICOSTERONE; ESTROGEN REPLACEMENT THERAPY; OVARIECTOMY

Funding

  1. UGC under the UGCRFSMS scheme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective The present study aims to determine the potential of melatonin supplementation in ameliorating tissue oxidative stress, elevated serum corticosterone and hepatic and renal dysfunction. Materials and methods Adult Wistar rats, either ovariectomized or sham-operated, served as experimental or control groups, respectively. Rats received either melatonin, estrogen, progesterone or a combination of melatonin and estrogen for a period of 15 days. Tissue oxidative stress, serum markers of hepatic and renal dysfunction and serum corticosterone level formed the parameters of assay in all groups at the end of the treatment schedule. Results Ovariectomized rats showed significant increases in levels of tissue lipid peroxidation, serum levels of glutamic pyruvic transaminase, glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase, alkaline phosphatase, acid phosphatase and corticosterone and significant decrement in enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant status. All parameters showed maximal reversal to control levels on supplementation with high-dose melatonin or estrogen + melatonin treatment. Conclusion Melatonin supplementation proved better than estrogen replacement therapy, with the higher dose being more effective in preventing ovariectomy-induced increases in oxidative stress and serum levels of marker parameters of hepatic and renal dysfunction and corticosterone titer. Overall, melatonin supplementation therapy qualifies as a more potent and safe alternative to estrogen replacement therapy in alleviating postmenopausal increases in oxidative stress and hepatic and renal dysfunction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available