4.3 Article

Acid ceramidase 1 expression correlates with a better prognosis in ER-positive breast cancer

Journal

CLIMACTERIC
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages 502-513

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/13697130902939913

Keywords

SPHINGOLIPID; BREAST CANCER; MICROARRAY; LASS4; LASS6; ACID CERAMIDASE 1

Funding

  1. Deutsche Krebshilfe
  2. Margarete Bonifer-Stiftung, Bad Soden
  3. Dr. Robert Pfleger-Stiftung, Bamberg
  4. BANSS-Stiftung, Biedenkopf

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives Ceramide and sphingosine mediate response to cancer therapy, inhibit cell growth and induce apoptosis in vitro. Only a few clinical data about the impact of ceramide and sphingosine in vivo are available. We investigated the relevance of ceramide-and sphingosine-generating enzymes in breast cancer (acid ceramidase 1 (ASAH1), ceramide synthases 4 (LASS4) and 6 (LASS6)) by means of gene expression analysis. Methods We analyzed differences in ASAH1, LASS4 and LASS6 on mRNA level between breast cancer subgroups using microarray data from 1581 tumor samples. Results High ASAH1, LASS4 and LASS6 expression correlates with pathohistological grading (p < 0.001) and estrogen receptor (ER) status (p < 0.001). High ASAH1 expression was associated with a larger tumor size 42 cm (p = 0.003), while high LASS6 expression was correlated with ErbB2 negativity (p < 0.001). In survival analysis, we detected a significant better prognosis of patients with higher ASAH1 expression (p = 0.002) in the ER-positive subgroup. In contrast, expression of LASS4 or LASS6 did not show any prognostic impact. In the multivariate analysis, only ASAH1 expression (p = 0.002), tumor size (p < 0.0001) and ErbB2 positivity (p = 0.041) remained significant. Conclusion ASAH1 is an estrogen-dependent member of the sphingolipid metabolism, which might provide further prognostic information in ER-positive breast cancers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available