4.5 Review

Implementation of Diversified Ecological Networks to Strengthen Wetland Conservation

Journal

CLEAN-SOIL AIR WATER
Volume 40, Issue 10, Pages 1015-1026

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/clen.201200026

Keywords

Ecosystem connectivity; Ecosystem conservation; Multiple scales; Wetland network

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U0833002]
  2. China National Funds for Distinguished Young Scientists [51125035]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2009SD-24]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The notion that the conservation of wetlands in the world is too limited has gained a universal consensus because of the conflicts between their great value and the drastic decline in their quantity and quality. To mitigate these conflicts, ecological networks have integrated the hydrologic and biological connectivity of ecosystems. The basic elements of ecological networks, patches, and corridors, have been extracted to reflect the attributes of the hydrologic and biological connectivity of ecosystems. This paper reviews recent applications of network approaches to ecological conservation, focusing on their application in wetland ecosystems, and proposing a new perspective for wetland conservation. This review is limited to four aspects: first, the linkages between wetlands and ecological networks are determined by reviewing the development both of them; second, the two types of connectivity and their application that can be obtained from graphs or network models are discussed; third, common network analysis approaches, which can provide a theoretical basis to explore the optimal relationship between network structure and function, are summarized; finally, this paper presents the configuration and convergence characteristics of different types of wetland networks at multiple spatial scales. At the conclusion, suggestions for further work are presented.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available