4.5 Article

Experimental and modelling studies of carbon dioxide adsorption by porous biomass derived activated carbon

Journal

CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
Volume 16, Issue 7, Pages 1353-1361

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10098-014-0788-6

Keywords

Activated carbon; Activation energy; CO2 capture; Flue gas; Pseudo-second-order model

Funding

  1. Top-Down Nanotechnology Research Grant under Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation [NND/NA/(1)/TD11-036]
  2. Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The goal of the study was to produce a low-cost activated carbon from agricultural residues via single stage carbon dioxide (CO2) activation and to investigate its applicability in capturing CO2 flue gas. The performance of the activated carbon was characterized in terms of the chemical composition, surface morphology as well as textural characteristics. The adsorption capacity was investigated at three temperatures of 25, 50 and 100 A degrees C for different types of adsorbate, such as purified carbon dioxide and binary mixture of carbon dioxide and nitrogen. The purified CO2 adsorption study showed that the greatest adsorption capacity of the optimized activated carbon of 1.79 mmol g(-1) was obtained at the lowest operating temperature. In addition, the adsorption study proved that the adsorption capacity for binary mixtures was lower due to the reduction in partial pressure. The experimental values of the purified CO2 adsorption were modelled by the Lagergren pseudo-first-order model, pseudo-second-order model, and intra-particle diffusion model. Based on the analysis, it inferred that the adsorption of CO2 followed the pseudo-second-order model with regression coefficient value higher than 0.995. In addition, the adsorption study was governed by both film diffusion and intra-particle diffusion. The activation energy that was lesser than 25 kJ mol(-1) implied that physical adsorption (physisorption) occurred.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available