4.5 Article

Comparison of ecological footprint for biobased PHA production from animal residues utilizing different energy resources

Journal

CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages 525-536

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10098-013-0608-4

Keywords

PHA; Biopolymers; Animal residues; Energy resources; Sustainable Process Index; Ecological footprint

Funding

  1. European Commission, Acronym ANIMPOL [245084]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Realizing a sustainable development of our planet requires a reduction of waste production, harmful emissions, and higher energy efficiency as well as utilization of renewable energy sources. One pathway to this end is the design of sustainable biorefinery concepts. Utilizing waste streams as raw material is gaining great importance in this respect. This reduces environmental burden and may at the same time contribute to economic performance of biorefineries. This paper investigates the utilization of slaughtering waste to produce biodegradable polyesters, polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA), via bioconversion. PHA are the target product while production of high quality biodiesel along with meat and bone meal (MBM) as by-products improves the economic performance of the process. The paper focuses on ecological comparison of different production scenarios and the effect of geographical location of production plants taking different energy production technologies and resources into account; ecological footprint evaluation using Sustainable Process Index methodology was applied. Keeping in mind that the carbon source for PHA production is produced from waste by energy intensive rendering process, the effect of available energy mixes in different countries becomes significant. Ecological footprint results from the current study show a bandwidth from 372,950 to 956,060 m(2)/t PHA production, depending on the energy mix used in the process which is compared to 2,508,409 m(2)/t for low density polyethylene.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available