4.5 Article

A GIS-based evaluation of risks due to trihalomethane exposure during showering in coastal Texas

Journal

CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages 551-564

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10098-011-0415-8

Keywords

Trihalomethanes; Risk assessment; Geostatistics; Water resource planning; Groundwater; Texas Gulf Coast; Inhalation; GIS

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [HRD-0734850]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Disinfection of water supplies with chlorine is essential to water treatment, but can lead to the formation of trihalomethanes (THMs) in the presence of natural organic matter. Exposure to THMs via inhalation during daily activities such as showering can significantly increase cancer risks. An innovative decision support system was developed for evaluating THM exposure and risks in water supplies in the Gulf Coast region of Texas by combining a shower THM volatilization model, geospatial analysis techniques, and risk assessment methodologies. Based on THM data from fourteen locations in the region, a power-law equation was developed to predict the formation of THMs in groundwater wells. Health risks associated with THMs in the water supplies of the Gulf Coast of Texas were evaluated. Cancer risks were found to vary from 7.14 x 10(-7) to 7.75 x 10(-6). While two-thirds of the geographical area was below the threshold risk of 1 x 10(-6), it accounted for only a tenth of the total population. Metropolitan areas such as Corpus Christi and McAllen, which currently use surface water sources, and Houston, which is seeking alternate water sources due to subsidence issues, were found to have significant cancer risks (in excess of one in a million). A third of the population of Texas is housed in the Gulf Coast region, and with more population migration toward the metropolitan areas, it is recommended that water resource management decisions be made taking into consideration both the quantity and quality of water available.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available