Journal
CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM GRAVITY
Volume 26, Issue 15, Pages -Publisher
IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0264-9381/26/15/155005
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission [07dz22020]
- Shanghai Normal University [DZL712, DKL934, PL905]
- Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [07KJD140011]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
By considering the potential parameter Gamma as a function of another potential parameter lambda (Zhou et al 2008 Phys. Lett. B 660 7-12), we successfully extend the analysis of a two-dimensional autonomous dynamical system of a quintessence scalar field model to the analysis of a three-dimensional system, which enables us to study the critical points of a large number of potentials beyond the exponential potential exactly. We find that there are ten critical points in all, three points P-3,P-5,P-6 are general points which are possessed by all quintessence models regardless of the form of potentials and the rest of the points are closely connected to the concrete potentials. It is quite surprising that, apart from the exponential potential, there are a large number of potentials which can give a scaling solution when the function f (lambda)(= Gamma(lambda) - 1) equals zero for one or some values of lambda(*) and if the parameter lambda(*) also satisfies condition (16) or (17) at the same time. We give the differential equations to derive these potentials V (phi) from f (lambda). We also find that, if some conditions are satisfied, the de-Sitter-like dominant point P-4 and the scaling solution point P-9 (or P-10) can be stable simultaneously unlike P-9 and P-10. Although we survey scaling solutions beyond the exponential potential for ordinary quintessence models in standard general relativity, this method can be applied to other extensively scaling solution models studied in the literature (Copeland et al 2006 Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 15 1753) including coupled quintessence, (coupled-)phantom scalar field, k-essence and even beyond the general relativity case H-2 proportional to rho(n)(T). We also discuss the disadvantage of our approach.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available