4.5 Review

Plastid genomes and deep relationships among the commelinid monocot angiosperms

Journal

CLADISTICS
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages 65-87

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2012.00418.x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (USA) [DEB-0830020, DEB-0830009, DEB-0829762]
  2. Division Of Environmental Biology
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences [0829762, 0830020] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Division Of Environmental Biology
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences [0830009] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The commelinid monocots comprise the orders Arecales (A), Commelinales (C), Poales sensu Angiosperm Phylogeny Group III (APGIII) (P), Zingiberales (Z), plus the unplaced family Dasypogonaceae (D), collectively containing numerous economically and ecologically important species and encompassing enormous morphological diversity. Commelinids are supported as monophyletic based on anatomy and molecular data; however, relationships among major commelinid groupings conflict among previous studies, representing a long-standing problem in monocot systematics, with major implications for interpretations of character evolution. In more recent analyses, with whole-plastome sampling largely focused on Poales, areas of conflict remain, suggesting the need for closer investigation of relationships and support. Here, we increased sampling of plastomes among non-Poalean commelinid orders to investigate deep nodal support. Analysis of 83 plastid genes recovered relationships as ((A, D) (ZC, P)) with robust support, regardless of reconstruction method (parsimony/likelihood). However, conflict among genes was evident when grouped by genomic region. Cumulative analyses of genes ranked by decreasing numbers of informative characters indicated continued fluctuation in support, even as small genes were added to a nearly complete matrix, contrary to the expected pattern of stabilization in support. Topology tests among major commelinid groups suggested that the data were not powerful enough to reject all alternatives. This study provides clues to the limits of the plastid genome for resolving deep relationships among the commelinid monocots. (C) The Willi Hennig Society 2012

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available