4.3 Article

Circulating 25-Hydroxy-Vitamin D and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies

Journal

CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR QUALITY AND OUTCOMES
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages 819-829

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.967604

Keywords

25-hydroxy-vitamin D; cardiovascular disease; meta-analysis; prospective study

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), Bethesda, MD [R00-HL095649]
  2. NIH/National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disease (NIDDK) [R01-DK088078]
  3. NIH [HL34594, CA138962]
  4. Intramural Research Program of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver NIH/National Institute of Child Health & Human Development (NICHD)
  5. NIH/National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)/National Institute on Aging (NIA)/National Center for Research Resources (NCRR)
  6. NIH Roadmap for Medical Research [U01 AR45580, U01 AR45614, U01 AR45632, U01 AR45647, U01 AR45654, U01 AR45583, U01 AG18197, U01-AG027810, UL1 RR024140]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background-Vitamin D status has been linked to the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, the optimal 25-hydroxy-vitamin D (25[OH]-vitamin D) levels for potential cardiovascular health benefits remain unclear. Methods and Results-We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE from 1966 through February 2012 for prospective studies that assessed the association of 25(OH)-vitamin D concentrations with CVD risk. A total of 24 articles met our inclusion criteria, from which 19 independent studies with 6123 CVD cases in 65 994 participants were included for a meta-analysis. In a comparison of the lowest with the highest 25(OH)-vitamin D categories, the pooled relative risk was 1.52 (95% confidence interval, 1.30-1.77) for total CVD, 1.42 (95% confidence interval, 1.19-1.71) for CVD mortality, 1.38 (95% confidence interval, 1.21-1.57) for coronary heart disease, and 1.64 (95% confidence interval, 1.27-2.10) for stroke. These associations remained strong and significant when analyses were limited to studies that excluded participants with baseline CVD and were better controlled for season and confounding. We used a fractional polynomial spline regression analysis to assess the linearity of dose-response association between continuous 25(OH)-vitamin D and CVD risk. The CVD risk increased monotonically across decreasing 25(OH)-vitamin D below approximate to 60 nmol/L, with a relative risk of 1.03 (95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.06) per 25-nmol/L decrement in 25(OH)-vitamin D. Conclusions-This meta-analysis demonstrated a generally linear, inverse association between circulating 25(OH)-vitamin D ranging from 20 to 60 nmol/L and risk of CVD. Further research is needed to clarify the association of 25(OH)-vitamin D higher than 60 nmol/L with CVD risk and assess causality of the observed associations. (Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012;5:819-829.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available