4.3 Article

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Effects of Elinogrel Results of the Platelet Function Substudy From the Intravenous and Oral Administration of Elinogrel to Evaluate Tolerability and Efficacy in Nonurgent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Patients (INNOVATE-PCI) Trial

Journal

CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages 347-356

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.965608

Keywords

elinogrel; pharmacodynamics; pharmacokinetics

Funding

  1. Portola Pharmaceuticals (San Francisco, CA)
  2. Bristol Myers Squibb
  3. Sanofi-Aventis
  4. Eli Lilly Co
  5. Daiichi Sankyo, Inc
  6. The Medicines Company
  7. Portola
  8. Novartis
  9. Medicure
  10. Accumetrics
  11. Arena Pharmaceuticals
  12. Astra Zeneca
  13. Abbott Vascular
  14. GlaxoSmithKline
  15. Otsuka
  16. Schering-Plough
  17. Astra-Zeneca
  18. Eisai
  19. AstraZeneca
  20. Boehringer Ingelheim
  21. Eli Lilly
  22. Portola Pharmaceuticals
  23. Merck
  24. Atrium Medical
  25. Schering-Plough/Merck
  26. Medtronic
  27. Lilly/Daiichi Sankyo Inc
  28. Sanofi Aventis/Bristol Myers
  29. Boston-Scientific
  30. Bayer
  31. Norvatis
  32. Pozen
  33. Johnson and Johnson
  34. The Medicines Co
  35. Sanofi Aventis
  36. Bristol-Myers-Squibb
  37. Duke University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background-Elinogrel is the only selective, competitive and reversible platelet P2Y(12) inhibitor available in both intravenous (IV) and oral formulations. Methods and Results-This substudy of the Intravenous and Oral Administration of Elinogrel to Evaluate Tolerability and Efficacy in Nonurgent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention patients (INNOVATE-PCI) trial evaluated the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of two dosing regimens of IV followed by oral elinogrel (120 mg IV plus 100 mg oral twice daily; 120 mg IV plus 150 mg oral twice daily) versus standard clopidogrel therapy (300-600 mg oral loading dose plus 75 mg oral maintenance dose) in 56 patients undergoing nonurgent PCI. At time of randomization, 71.4% (40/56) of patients were using maintenance clopidogrel therapy. In the acute phase, an IV bolus of elinogrel achieved more rapid and potent antiplatelet effects compared with clopidogrel, which were sustained during the transition from the IV to the oral formulation in the first 24 hours of the peri-PCI period. During chronic therapy, elinogrel achieved similar levels of platelet reactivity compared with clopidogrel before the next oral dose and, although platelet reactivity was lower with elinogrel up to 6 hours after daily oral maintenance dosing, these differences were not statistically significant. These pharmacodynamic effects matched the pharmacokinetic profile of elinogrel. There were no differences in pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic effects between the two elinogrel dosing regimens. Conclusions-Compared with clopidogrel, the combination of IV and oral elinogrel achieves more rapid and enhanced antiplatelet effects that were sustained through the transition to oral elinogrel in the peri-PCI period, but these were not significant during chronic dosing in this pilot investigation. Clinical Trial Registration-URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00751231. (Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5:347-356.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available